APPSEC & DEVSECOPS SOLUTIONS
Web, mobile, and API security assessments designed to integrate into your development lifecycle without slowing release momentum.
All services in this direction
Choose by outcome
Start with the smallest service that provides enough evidence for the next decision.
Web App Testing
In-depth testing of authentication, complex multi-role authorization (BOLA/IDOR), session integrity, and business logic flaws.
- Best for
- Before public or enterprise-customer launch
- Outcome
- Role and critical-workflow test matrix
API Security & Stress Testing
In-depth penetration testing of REST, GraphQL, and gRPC endpoints across multiple authentication tokens and multi-step workflows.
- Best for
- APIs handling sensitive customer or payment data
- Outcome
- Endpoint, role and object-access matrix
Mobile App Testing
Comprehensive binary analysis, insecure local storage review, reverse engineering resistance, and backend API testing on physical devices.
- Best for
- Before public App Store or Google Play release
- Outcome
- MASVS control and MASTG test-coverage matrix
Code Review & DevSecOps
Manual and automated static code analysis, SAST/SCA tool calibration, and automated security gates in your CI/CD pipeline.
- Best for
- Critical systems before release or acquisition
- Outcome
- Manual findings with file/line and data-flow context
Before we start
Frequently asked questions
When is the best time to conduct an application security review?
Security considerations should begin during architectural design. Formal penetration testing is best performed in a staging environment 2–3 weeks prior to major production releases, allowing sufficient time for remediation.
Can we begin with a small scope?
Yes. The work can be divided into a priority first stage and a longer roadmap. The first stage still needs to produce a usable decision rather than a generic presentation.
How is our information protected?
Before accessing data, we agree confidentiality, authorised systems, data minimisation, storage, encryption, access control and deletion. The exact terms must be included in the contract and statement of work.
When should security enter the development process?
Before architecture is fixed, so threat modelling and security requirements can shape design. Automated checks then provide fast feedback, while manual testing validates business logic and attack chains before a material release.
Does SAST replace manual code review?
No. SAST is effective for repeatable patterns but creates noise and lacks full business context. Manual review is especially valuable around authentication, authorisation, cryptography, secrets, deserialisation and critical logic.